Syllogism

Syllogism

Easy Questions
Moderate Questions
Difficult Questions
Syllogism Tutorial

Verbal Reasoning

Eligibility Test
Logical order of words
Mathematical operation and symbol notation
Clock and calender
Problem Based on ages
Alphabet Test
Input Output
Linear Arrangement
Matrix Arrangement
Circular Arrangement
Logical Connectivity
Games And Tournament
Analogy
Classification
Number Series
Letter and Symbol Series
Coding Decoding
Sequencing and Formation
Direction and Distance
Sitting Arrangement
Blood Relations
Logical Venn Diagram
Cubes
Logical Problems
Theme Detection
Logical Deduction
Matching Definitions
Making Judgments
Logical Games
Verification of Truth/Lie of Statements
Routes and Networks
Time Sequence
Ranking Test
Inserting and Missing Character
Grid and Matrices
Syllogism
Statement and Argument
Statement and Assumption
Statement and Courses of Action
Statement and Conclusion
Cause and Effect
Grouping and Team Formation
Assertion and Reason
Situation Reaction Test

Direction: Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer.

  1. Statements:
    All Americans are English – speaking.
    No Eskimos are English – speaking
    Conclusions:
    I. No Eskimos are Americans.
    II. No English – speakers are Eskimos.








  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
    All Americans are English-speaking. ↔ No English-speaking are Eskimos.

    Correct Option: D

    First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    Second Premise is Universal Negative (E-type).
    All Americans are English-speaking. ↔ No English-speaking are Eskimos.
    A + E ⇒ E-type of Conclusion “No American is Eskimo.”
    Conclusion I is Converse of it.
    Conclusion II is Converse of the second Premise.

Direction: Some statements are given followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any, follow from the given statements. Indicate your answer.

  1. Statements:
    All chickens are birds.
    Some chickens are hens.
    Female birds lay eggs.
    Conclusions:
    I. All birds lay eggs.
    II. Some hens are birds.
    III. Some chickens are not hens.








  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
    Some hens are chickens. ↔ All chickens are birds.

    Correct Option: D

    First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
    Some hens are chickens. ↔ All chickens are birds.
    I + A ⇒ I – type of Conclusion “Some hens are birds.”
    This is Conclusion II.

Direction: In each of the following questions, one/two statements are given followed by two conclusions/assumptions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions/assumptions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Indicate your answer.

  1. Statements
    All cows are animals.
    All deers are cows.
    Conclusions
    I. All deers are animals.
    II. All animals are cows.








  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    All deers are cows. ↔ All cows are animals.

    Correct Option: A

    Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    All deers are cows. ↔ All cows are animals.
    A + A ⇒ A-type of Conclusion “All deers are animals”
    This is Conclusion I.

Direction: Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Indicate your answer.

  1. Statements:
    Some scales are pencils.
    Some erasers are pencils.
    Conclusions:
    I. Some pencils are erasers.
    II. Some pencils are scales.








  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
    No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.

    Correct Option: C

    Both the Premises are Particular Affirmative (I-type).
    No Conclusion follows from the two Particular Premises.
    Conclusion I is Converse of the second Premise.
    Conclusion II is Converse of the first Premise.

Direction: Two statements are given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given inferences can definitely be drawn from the given statements.

  1. Statements:
    (a) All cupboards are watches.
    (b) All watches are costly.
    Inferences:
    I. All cupboards are costly.
    II. Some costly things are cupboards.








  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    All cupboards are watches. ↔ All watches are costly.

    Correct Option: C

    Both the Premises are Universal Affirmative (A-type).
    All cupboards are watches. ↔ All watches are costly.
    A + A → A-type of Conclusion “All cupboards are costly.”
    This is Conclusion I.
    Conclusion II is converse of it.