Statement and Argument


  1. Statements:
    Should all those who are convicted for heinous crimes like murder or rape, beyond all reasonable doubts be given capital punished or death penalty?
    Arguments:
    I. No. the death penalty should be given only in very rate and exceptional cases.
    II. Yes. This is the only way to punish such people who take other' lives or indulge in inhuman activities
    III. Yes. Such sever punishments only will make people refrain from such heinous acts and the society will be safer.
    IV. No. Those who are repentant for the crime they committed should be given a chance to improve and lead a normal life.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Clearly, a 'person commuting a heinous crime like murder or rape should be so punished as to set an example for other not to attempt such acts in future. So, argument III holds strong. Argument I is vague while the use of the word 'only' in argument II makes it weak. Also, it cannot be assured whether a criminal is really repentant of his acts or not, he may also exhibit so just to get rid off punishment. So, argument IV also does not hold.

    Correct Option: C

    Clearly, a 'person commuting a heinous crime like murder or rape should be so punished as to set an example for other not to attempt such acts in future. So, argument III holds strong. Argument I is vague while the use of the word 'only' in argument II makes it weak. Also, it cannot be assured whether a criminal is really repentant of his acts or not, he may also exhibit so just to get rid off punishment. So, argument IV also does not hold.


  1. Statement:
    Should the rule of wearing helmet for both driver and pillion rider while driving a motor bike be enforced strictly?
    Argument:
    I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all.
    II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.
    III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.
    IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Clearly, the rule has been devised or the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two-wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to head injury and finally death. And the objective of a rule cannot be fulfilled until it is followed by all and this required strict enforcement. Thus, both I and IV hold strong, while III does not. Besides, it is the basic duty of the Government to look after the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the direction of the individuals. So, argument II does not hold strong.

    Correct Option: C

    Clearly, the rule has been devised or the safety of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two-wheeler accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to head injury and finally death. And the objective of a rule cannot be fulfilled until it is followed by all and this required strict enforcement. Thus, both I and IV hold strong, while III does not. Besides, it is the basic duty of the Government to look after the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the safety of the citizens and it ought not leave it to the direction of the individuals. So, argument II does not hold strong.



  1. Statements:
    Should class IV children have Board examination?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes. This will motivate the children to study and get higher marks, and thus more knowledge can be imbibed at a younger age.
    II. No. The children will be forced to study and won't enjoy the process.
    III. Yes. In today's competitive would the children need to be prepared right from the beginning to face such difficult examinations.
    IV. No. This will add pressure on tender aged children and leave very little time or them to play.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Young children of class IV ought to be taught the basic fundamentals of subjects in a gradual process via practical examples and practice in a playful manner. They need not be made to study through compulsion and their age is not such as to bear the tension and their age is not such as to bear the tension and burden of examinations. So, both II and IV hold strong. However, facing examinations at this stage shall prepare them to tackle the competitions in later life. So, III also hold. However, holding examinations cannot motivate such young and immature students, neither is it a way to make them learn more. So, i does not holds strong.

    Correct Option: C

    Young children of class IV ought to be taught the basic fundamentals of subjects in a gradual process via practical examples and practice in a playful manner. They need not be made to study through compulsion and their age is not such as to bear the tension and their age is not such as to bear the tension and burden of examinations. So, both II and IV hold strong. However, facing examinations at this stage shall prepare them to tackle the competitions in later life. So, III also hold. However, holding examinations cannot motivate such young and immature students, neither is it a way to make them learn more. So, i does not holds strong.


Direction: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the argument is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.

  1. Statement:
    Should there be only few banks in place of numerous banks in India?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes. This will help secure the investor's money as these big banks will be able to withstand intermitten market related shocks.
    II. No. A large number of people will lose their jobs as after the merger many employees will be redundant.
    III. Yes. This will help consolidate the entire banking industry and will lead to healthy competition











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    The security of the investor's money is not related to the size of the bank. Besides, even after consolidation, the number of investors, their amounts and hence the duties shall remain the same and so no employees will be redundant.Reducing the number of smaller banks will also not affect the mutual competition among the banks. Thus,none of the arguments hold strong.

    Correct Option: A

    The security of the investor's money is not related to the size of the bank. Besides, even after consolidation, the number of investors, their amounts and hence the duties shall remain the same and so no employees will be redundant.Reducing the number of smaller banks will also not affect the mutual competition among the banks. Thus,none of the arguments hold strong.



  1. Statement:
    Should religion be taught in our schools?
    Argument:
    I. No. Ours is a secular state
    II. Yes. Teaching religion helps include moral values among children
    III. No. How can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfill its role in the 21st century











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Ours is a secular state does not mean that religion and religious values should be eradicated.In fact,these inculcate moral values. So, argument II is strong. Also, teaching religion can in no way hinder the students, capability to face the challenges of the 21st century.

    Correct Option: D

    Ours is a secular state does not mean that religion and religious values should be eradicated.In fact,these inculcate moral values. So, argument II is strong. Also, teaching religion can in no way hinder the students, capability to face the challenges of the 21st century.