Table chart
Direction: Study the following table carefully to answer the questions that follow : Number of Executives recruited by six different organisations over the years
- What is the percent increase in the number of Executives recruited by organisation R in 2005 from the previous year? (Rounded off to two digits after decimal)
-
View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum
Required percentage increase = total increase in the number of Executives recruited by organisation R x 100% Total number of Executives recruited by organisation R in 2004
Correct Option: B
As per given table , we can see that
Number of Executives recruited by organisation R in 2005 = 472
Number of Executives recruited by organisation R in 2004 = 418
total increase in the number of Executives recruited by organisation R = 472 - 418 = 54Required percentage increase = total increase in the number of Executives recruited by organisation R x 100% Total number of Executives recruited by organisation R in 2004 = 54 x 100 = 12.919 ≈ 12.92% 418
Direction: Study the table carefully to answer the questions that follow : Number of candidates appeared and qualified for a test (in hundred) in 6 different years from 5 different zones.
- The number of candidates who qualified the test from Zone R in the year 2010 was approximately what percentage of the number of candidates who appeared from Zone Q in the year 2008?
-
View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum
Required percentage = The number of candidates who qualified the test from Zone R in the year 2010 x 100% the number of candidates who appeared from Zone Q in the year 2008 Correct Option: E
As per given table graph, we can see that
The number of candidates who qualified the test from Zone R in the year 2010 = 7.4
The number of candidates who appeared from Zone Q in the year 2008 = 7.4Required percentage = The number of candidates who qualified the test from Zone R in the year 2010 x 100% The number of candidates who appeared from Zone Q in the year 2008 = 7.4 x 100 = 137 % 5.4
- What was the ratio of the number of candidates appeared from Zone P in the year 2005 to the number of candidates qualified from Zone S in the year 2007?
-
View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum
∴ Required ratio = the number of candidates appeared from Zone P in the year 2005 the number of candidates qualified from Zone S in the year 2007
Correct Option: A
∴ Required ratio = the number of candidates appeared from Zone P in the year 2005 the number of candidates qualified from Zone S in the year 2007 = 3.2 = 4 5.6 7
- In which year was in Zone S the difference between the appeared candidates and qualified candidates the second lowest?
-
View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum
Difference between the appeared candidates and qualified candidates in the zone S in below table :
Correct Option: B
As per given graph , It is clear that Difference between the appeared candidates and qualified candidates in the zone S :
Hence required answer will be 2007 year , which is second lowest ( 270 ).
- From which zone was the total number of candidates who qualified the test, the second highest in the year 2009 and 2010 together?
-
View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum
Number of candidates qualified in the years 2009 and 2010 together:
Zone = ( Number of candidates qualified in the year 2009 + Number of candidates qualified in the year 2010 ) × 100Correct Option: E
Number of candidates qualified in the years 2009 and 2010 together:
Zone = ( Number of candidates qualified in the year 2009 + Number of candidates qualified in the year 2010 ) × 100
Zone S: (11.4 + 5.2) × 100 = 16.6 × 100 = 1660
Zone T:: (6.9 + 9.4) × 100 = 16.3 × 100 = 1630
Hence , Zone T will be the second highest in the years 2009 and 2010 .
