Statement and Argument


Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ''Strong'' arguments and ''Weak'' arguments insofar as they relate to the question. ''Strong'' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. ''Weak'' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.

  1. Statement:
    Should fixation of rents be a matter between landlords and tenants?
    Arguments :
    I. Yes, it is the sole right of landlords to fix rents according to his/her investment to carry livelihood and any intervention in this regard would violate Article 21 of the Constitution.
    II. No, this would increase the miseries of tenants because if landlords are give free hand they will start extorting money from their tenants.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Argument I is strong because it explains the constitutional rights of a person. II is a weak argument. There is no fear of extortion Because tenants will also be an equal party to rent fixation.

    Correct Option: A

    Argument I is strong because it explains the constitutional rights of a person. II is a weak argument. There is no fear of extortion Because tenants will also be an equal party to rent fixation.


  1. Statement:
    Should voting be made compulsory for all adults?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes. The candidates then elected would be far more representational.
    II. No. The citizens would thereby lose the right to not choose a representative.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I is strong: the more the number of voters, the better the representation. II is also strong if the concept of voting is seen analytically. When you vote, you decide to be with someone. Now, it is not necessary that you must be with someone. Such a compulsion would be going against the democratic principal .

    Correct Option: E

    I is strong: the more the number of voters, the better the representation. II is also strong if the concept of voting is seen analytically. When you vote, you decide to be with someone. Now, it is not necessary that you must be with someone. Such a compulsion would be going against the democratic principal .



  1. Statement:
    Should political activity on the campus be restrained?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes. Too much of politics vitiates the academic atmosphere.
    II. No. It will be an impingement on the students 'right to freedom.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    if only argument I is strong

    Correct Option: A

    if only argument I is strong


  1. Statement:
    Should communal violence be allowed on television ?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes, It is only when we see the devil within us that we can exorcise it.
    II. No, It leads to tensions in actual life.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I is strong. Literature and media are often hailed as mirrors of life. If the mirrors doesn't show the dirt on your face, it would be difficult to wipe it clean. II is also strong : there are many such instances.

    Correct Option: E

    I is strong. Literature and media are often hailed as mirrors of life. If the mirrors doesn't show the dirt on your face, it would be difficult to wipe it clean. II is also strong : there are many such instances.



  1. Statement:
    Should subsidy on domestic LPG cylinders be stopped?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes. It leads to misuse of LPG by housewives who over- cook their food.
    II. No. Any subsidy cannot be stopped in a country committed to social welfare.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I is not only a weak argument but absurd! Which house-wife would want to spoil her food by over- cooking it? II is also a weak argument: commitment to social welfare dose not imply blind carrying on of subsidies. The necessity of subsidies needs to be revised from time to time on a case-by -case basis.

    Correct Option: D

    I is not only a weak argument but absurd! Which house-wife would want to spoil her food by over- cooking it? II is also a weak argument: commitment to social welfare dose not imply blind carrying on of subsidies. The necessity of subsidies needs to be revised from time to time on a case-by -case basis.