Statement and Argument


Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ''Strong'' arguments and ''Weak'' arguments insofar as they relate to the question. ''Strong'' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. ''Weak'' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.

  1. Statement:
    Should the government allow use of LPG as a fuel for commercial vehicles?
    Arguments:
    I. No, when the petroleum agencies cannot fulfil the demand even for domestic use satisfactorily, how will they meet the demands for commercial vehicles?
    II. No, LPG fuel is not adaptable to the spark ignition engines and compressed ignition engines which are commonly used in the country.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    Since availability of LPG is necessary, I is strong. Again, it is not adaptable to our existing type of engines, Hence II is also strong.

    Correct Option: E

    Since availability of LPG is necessary, I is strong. Again, it is not adaptable to our existing type of engines, Hence II is also strong.


  1. Statement:
    Is the recent hike of about 50% in fees and transport charges by school in cities justified?
    Arguments :
    I. Yes, we have entered the era of information technology and inclusion of IT as a subject has put a burden of huge amount on schools due to expansion in infrastructure facilities.
    II. No, this will suddenly increase the burden of parents of the students.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I do not go into reasons of hike of transportation changes. Hence I is weak. II is strong because there will be a great effect on the budgets of the parents.

    Correct Option: D

    I do not go into reasons of hike of transportation changes. Hence I is weak. II is strong because there will be a great effect on the budgets of the parents.



  1. Statement:
    Should commercial activity be permitted in residential areas?
    Arguments:
    I. No, these activities impair the growth of residents of residential area.
    II. Yes, commercial activity adds to adds to economic development, and it one of the major aspects of economic activity.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I does not point out the reasons of impairment . But II is strong because an important part of economic activity can't be ignored.

    Correct Option: B

    I does not point out the reasons of impairment . But II is strong because an important part of economic activity can't be ignored.


  1. Statement:
    Is the WTO regime unfair to India?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes, the WTO bureaucracy has been openly supporting the agenda of large capital form the developed countries, and increasingly does not even pay lip service to the genuine demands of developing countries like India.
    II. No, if India cannot come up whit a consistent approach that links its domestic economic policy to its global trade strategy, why blame the WTO?











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    I is strong because being swept away by money is, unfair. II is strong because it shows why WTO can't help India in spite of being fair.

    Correct Option: E

    I is strong because being swept away by money is, unfair. II is strong because it shows why WTO can't help India in spite of being fair.



  1. Statement:
    Should banks be allowed to offer different interest rates in India?
    Arguments:
    I. Yes, this is the only way to eventually lower interest rates in the country.
    II. No, this will discourage the customers and they might be compelled to switch over from one bank to another.











  1. View Hint View Answer Discuss in Forum

    there is no relation between statement and argument so we cannot relate each other.

    Correct Option: D

    there is no relation between statement and argument so we cannot relate each other.
    if neither I nor II is strong